Discussion:
Ride an SUB not an SUV
(too old to reply)
donquijote1954
2007-03-03 18:47:13 UTC
Permalink
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.

There are two versions of it...

bike:

http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069

and bus:

http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110

or the whole REVOLUTION...

http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution
Qui si parla Campagnolo
2007-03-04 14:49:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
Post by donquijote1954
or the whole REVOLUTION...
http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution
donquijote1954
2007-03-04 21:55:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...

Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future

The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.

The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.

http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/

I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.

We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Bill Baka
2007-03-05 00:44:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
George Conklin
2007-03-05 01:33:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Clark F Morris
2007-03-05 02:29:40 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:33:58 GMT, "George Conklin"
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Actually, this isn't necessarily so. If you go to a trolleybus system
with regeneration, you will have a means of propulsion that more fits
the urban bus use (streetcars would have the save advantage). Since
the automobile usage is less of a stop and go mode, it would not get
the same benefits. Hybrid vehicles (bus rail and automobile) also
take advantage of the stop and go nature of city traffic but at the
cost of heavy batteries. This benefit is not useful in primarily
highway driving which is one reason I went for the Toyota Corolla
rather than the Toyota Prius.
George Conklin
2007-03-05 12:27:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Clark F Morris
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:33:58 GMT, "George Conklin"
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by Clark F Morris
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Actually, this isn't necessarily so. If you go to a trolleybus system
with regeneration, you will have a means of propulsion that more fits
the urban bus use (streetcars would have the save advantage).
And a plug-in hybrid car would easily beat both systems. It does not
make weekend runs, off-hour service and deadheading back to get more riders.
nash
2007-03-05 03:57:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
"Who killed the electric car" would be a good movie for this thread.
I will never buy anything from GM. Wusses!
George Conklin
2007-03-05 12:28:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
"Who killed the electric car" would be a good movie for this thread.
I will never buy anything from GM. Wusses!
The public killed the electric car because lead-acid batteries are not
really of much use in today's world. But a plug-in hybrid would meet the
needs of about 90% of American commuters.
nash
2007-03-05 16:28:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we
cruise
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
"Who killed the electric car" would be a good movie for this thread.
I will never buy anything from GM. Wusses!
The public killed the electric car because lead-acid batteries are not
really of much use in today's world. But a plug-in hybrid would meet the
needs of about 90% of American commuters.
If GM kept it it would have evolved because people were in love with it.
They crushed brand new cars and took them away from people who wanted to pay
for them. They were under pressure from oil and car makers to scrap it
because it would have been the right thing at the right time. Gee where
have I heard that one before. There would be no war with the US either if
they went that way.
George Conklin
2007-03-05 21:33:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by nash
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
On Mar 3, 11:47 am, "donquijote1954"
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we
cruise
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
"Who killed the electric car" would be a good movie for this thread.
I will never buy anything from GM. Wusses!
The public killed the electric car because lead-acid batteries are not
really of much use in today's world. But a plug-in hybrid would meet the
needs of about 90% of American commuters.
If GM kept it it would have evolved because people were in love with it.
They crushed brand new cars and took them away from people who wanted to pay
for them. They were under pressure from oil and car makers to scrap it
because it would have been the right thing at the right time. Gee where
have I heard that one before. There would be no war with the US either if
they went that way.
Sorry. Lead-acid batteries will not hack it even with high gas prices.
nash
2007-03-06 01:17:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
On Mar 3, 11:47 am, "donquijote1954"
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we
cruise
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown,
picking
Post by nash
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the
exhaust
Post by nash
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen
or
Post by nash
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil
to
Post by nash
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar,
hydro,
Post by nash
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
"Who killed the electric car" would be a good movie for this thread.
I will never buy anything from GM. Wusses!
The public killed the electric car because lead-acid batteries are not
really of much use in today's world. But a plug-in hybrid would meet
the
Post by nash
Post by donquijote1954
needs of about 90% of American commuters.
If GM kept it it would have evolved because people were in love with it.
They crushed brand new cars and took them away from people who wanted to
pay
Post by nash
for them. They were under pressure from oil and car makers to scrap it
because it would have been the right thing at the right time. Gee where
have I heard that one before. There would be no war with the US either
if
Post by nash
they went that way.
Sorry. Lead-acid batteries will not hack it even with high gas prices.
Why are you still arguing about lead-acid batteries? I did not say that
did I?
The movie is about more than the technology at the time. Do you really
think a progressive company like that would try to put lead batteries on
the market today. FF to 2007 and look back at the wars since the movie. I
think it was before 911 also. Check it.
Bill Baka
2007-03-06 04:56:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Sorry. Lead-acid batteries will not hack it even with high gas prices.
Why are you still arguing about lead-acid batteries? I did not say that
did I?
The movie is about more than the technology at the time. Do you really
think a progressive company like that would try to put lead batteries on
the market today. FF to 2007 and look back at the wars since the movie. I
think it was before 911 also. Check it.
We did have electric cars in the beginning when a charge of lead-acid
batteries would give you a good 20 miles. That was about what you could
get out of a horse every day. When gas cars started to get reliable and
over 30-40 miles between breakdowns the electrics died out. Strange that
the horses were the last to go.
Bill Baka
nash
2007-03-06 07:44:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Sorry. Lead-acid batteries will not hack it even with high gas prices.
Why are you still arguing about lead-acid batteries? I did not say that
did I?
The movie is about more than the technology at the time. Do you really
think a progressive company like that would try to put lead batteries on
the market today. FF to 2007 and look back at the wars since the movie.
I think it was before 911 also. Check it.
We did have electric cars in the beginning when a charge of lead-acid
batteries would give you a good 20 miles. That was about what you could
get out of a horse every day. When gas cars started to get reliable and
over 30-40 miles between breakdowns the electrics died out. Strange that
the horses were the last to go.
Bill Baka
These went 2-3 times as far and they could have put charging stations in
instead of gas stations if you had to go further on a daily basis. I think
they carried 6 batteries. Goes like stink and quiet as a mouse. They gave
them to movie stars like Tom Hanks so they had to be something special and
longer between "breakdowns".
donquijote1954
2007-03-05 17:48:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
"Who killed the electric car" would be a good movie for this thread.
I will never buy anything from GM. Wusses!- Hide quoted text -
The Tango is a fun option if you want to dance --or drive...

(I'd love one. Gotta ask Santa. Then buy life insurance, because I'd
be dead meat with it in the Darwinian roads where I live)

Tango

Doubling freeways. Quadrupling parking.
0-60 mph in 4 seconds.

The Tango--unique in many ways--has the solution for some of the major
problems we have with automobiles today. Traffic has overcome the
current freeway system. There are too many 4-passenger cars using an
entire lane to transport a single person. There is also too much
pollution from gasoline vehicles.

Solution: Reduce traffic and pollution with the Tango, a car that fits
its use! This tandem two-seater can get you safely and comfortably to
work and back without wasted space or fuel. The Tango--being 6"
narrower than many motorcycles--takes less than half the space of the
average car on the freeway, thereby doubling the capacity of existing
freeway lanes. The Tango can fit in a future 6 foot lane easier than a
truck fits in a standard 12 foot lane. To fight pollution it is
available as an electric zero-emission vehicle.

http://www.commutercars.com/http://personal.atl.bellsouth.net/t/r/troprent/ford.htm
donquijote1954
2007-03-05 18:23:29 UTC
Permalink
I'm warning you, the Tango is not for the average wannabe Napoleon
driving an SUV out there. This is for the sleek and elegant, for the
smart and classic, for the fun and passionate, for the caring and
unselfish. Status-seekers who want to stand out by driving a
polluting, dangerous oversized vehicle need not apply. Without further
ado...

http://www.electrifyingtimes.com/ClooneyTango.html
George Conklin
2007-03-05 21:34:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
"Who killed the electric car" would be a good movie for this thread.
I will never buy anything from GM. Wusses!- Hide quoted text -
The Tango is a fun option if you want to dance --or drive...
(I'd love one. Gotta ask Santa. Then buy life insurance, because I'd
be dead meat with it in the Darwinian roads where I live)
Tango
Doubling freeways. Quadrupling parking.
0-60 mph in 4 seconds.
The Tango--unique in many ways--has the solution for some of the major
problems we have with automobiles today. Traffic has overcome the
current freeway system. There are too many 4-passenger cars using an
entire lane to transport a single person. There is also too much
pollution from gasoline vehicles.
Solution: Reduce traffic and pollution with the Tango,
CU reports on the Car for Two. It is the worst car they ever tested.
donquijote1954
2007-03-05 22:32:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future,
and
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we
cruise
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown,
picking
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years
ago
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil
to
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar,
hydro,
Post by donquijote1954
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
"Who killed the electric car" would be a good movie for this thread.
I will never buy anything from GM. Wusses!- Hide quoted text -
The Tango is a fun option if you want to dance --or drive...
(I'd love one. Gotta ask Santa. Then buy life insurance, because I'd
be dead meat with it in the Darwinian roads where I live)
Tango
Doubling freeways. Quadrupling parking.
0-60 mph in 4 seconds.
The Tango--unique in many ways--has the solution for some of the major
problems we have with automobiles today. Traffic has overcome the
current freeway system. There are too many 4-passenger cars using an
entire lane to transport a single person. There is also too much
pollution from gasoline vehicles.
Solution: Reduce traffic and pollution with the Tango,
CU reports on the Car for Two. It is the worst car they ever tested.- Hide quoted text -
In a collision with what, a Hummer? I'm sure that if it hit another
Tango, it would have the same consequences as if two Hummers rammed
each other.
Daryl Hunt
2007-03-05 20:16:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
"Who killed the electric car" would be a good movie for this thread.
I will never buy anything from GM. Wusses!
They didn't kill it but they did slow it down. You will notice that Carlin
is saying it's because of the Lead Acid Batteries. It's not. LiIon,
mercury ion and (soon to be) Sulfure Ion are extremely efficient and much
lighter than a SLA. Those are the batteries that should be used. But
Toyota still saddles their Hybrids with SLAs so there is no savings or smog
lessing. SLAs have about a 1000 hour service life but reduce when they hit
about 500 hours or more. That means you have to replace them and that is
danged expensive when you are talking about a dual batteried 72v system.
That would be 12 Deep Cycle Sealed Lead Acids. I don't see the savings nor
the reduction on the environment.
Bill Baka
2007-03-07 03:11:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
"Who killed the electric car" would be a good movie for this thread.
I will never buy anything from GM. Wusses!
They didn't kill it but they did slow it down. You will notice that Carlin
is saying it's because of the Lead Acid Batteries. It's not. LiIon,
mercury ion and (soon to be) Sulfure Ion are extremely efficient and much
lighter than a SLA. Those are the batteries that should be used. But
Toyota still saddles their Hybrids with SLAs so there is no savings or smog
lessing. SLAs have about a 1000 hour service life but reduce when they hit
about 500 hours or more. That means you have to replace them and that is
danged expensive when you are talking about a dual batteried 72v system.
That would be 12 Deep Cycle Sealed Lead Acids. I don't see the savings nor
the reduction on the environment.
They didn't invent it either by about 100 years. When gas engines were
nasty little beasts there were some electric cars in production. The
idea was that you could get 10 or maybe even 20 miles and just plug it
in at night. No horses to feed and water, simple, really. Then when cars
actually got better, around the early 20's, not only the horses, but
also the electric cars pretty much went away. The cars were no longer
manufactured so you couldn't get a new one, but at least the die hards
could get a new horse. 1920----1990+, seems like a damn long time to
ignore electrics. I do remember in the 1970's after the OPEC embargo
that some mail buggies were electric powered. You could hear the power
transistors switching at about 400 Hz. Then oil got a little cheaper and
the government went back to gas. GM doesn't get to take credit for much
of anything when it gets right down to it.
Bill Baka

P.S. Thomas Edison invented almost nothing on his own. He just saw half
developed ideas and improved them enough to get his own patent.
No wonder he and Tesla didn't get along. AC versus DC.
Bill Baka
2007-03-05 05:09:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Only if nobody rides them. When I was a kid in the Chicago area I could
go anywhere on a weekend with a travel buddy of mine. We took the train
into downtown, then the 'el' ( hard to explain), and over/underground
subway system. Then there were electric trolley buses, and finally
regular buses to get us within walking distance.
And, yes, any one of those modes of transportation sucks fuel big time
if nobody rides them. If they are full they are a good thing. SUV's and
single occupant soccer moms have messed up the equation.
Bill Baka
George Conklin
2007-03-05 12:29:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Only if nobody rides them. When I was a kid in the Chicago area I could
go anywhere on a weekend with a travel buddy of mine. We took the train
into downtown, then the 'el' ( hard to explain), and over/underground
subway system. Then there were electric trolley buses, and finally
regular buses to get us within walking distance.
And, yes, any one of those modes of transportation sucks fuel big time
if nobody rides them. If they are full they are a good thing. SUV's and
single occupant soccer moms have messed up the equation.
Bill Baka
Actually a SUV would use about the same fuel as a current transit bus.
Clark F Morris
2007-03-05 14:05:17 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:29:39 GMT, "George Conklin"
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Only if nobody rides them. When I was a kid in the Chicago area I could
go anywhere on a weekend with a travel buddy of mine. We took the train
into downtown, then the 'el' ( hard to explain), and over/underground
subway system. Then there were electric trolley buses, and finally
regular buses to get us within walking distance.
And, yes, any one of those modes of transportation sucks fuel big time
if nobody rides them. If they are full they are a good thing. SUV's and
single occupant soccer moms have messed up the equation.
Bill Baka
Actually a SUV would use about the same fuel as a current transit bus.
George, while SUVs are fuel guzzlers, they still get 2 - 3 times the
miles per gallon as a transit bus. The question is whether the
transit bus average loading is 3 or more times greater than the
average loading of an SUV in similar circumstances (urban area driving
only and dead head trips included). Any time there is carpooling
there probably is either dead head mileage or circuity, sometimes
both.
Bill Baka
2007-03-05 19:28:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Clark F Morris
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:29:39 GMT, "George Conklin"
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Only if nobody rides them. When I was a kid in the Chicago area I could
go anywhere on a weekend with a travel buddy of mine. We took the train
into downtown, then the 'el' ( hard to explain), and over/underground
subway system. Then there were electric trolley buses, and finally
regular buses to get us within walking distance.
And, yes, any one of those modes of transportation sucks fuel big time
if nobody rides them. If they are full they are a good thing. SUV's and
single occupant soccer moms have messed up the equation.
Bill Baka
Actually a SUV would use about the same fuel as a current transit bus.
George, while SUVs are fuel guzzlers, they still get 2 - 3 times the
miles per gallon as a transit bus. The question is whether the
transit bus average loading is 3 or more times greater than the
average loading of an SUV in similar circumstances (urban area driving
only and dead head trips included). Any time there is carpooling
there probably is either dead head mileage or circuity, sometimes
both.
Gas is going to have to hit $3 a gallon and stay there for the soccer
mom crowd to realize they need a little Geo-Metro 3 banger just to run
to the store for a pack of smokes, or some shit paper or other silly
little errand. People are slow learners.
Bill Baka
George Conklin
2007-03-05 21:41:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Clark F Morris
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:29:39 GMT, "George Conklin"
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Clark F Morris
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Only if nobody rides them. When I was a kid in the Chicago area I could
go anywhere on a weekend with a travel buddy of mine. We took the train
into downtown, then the 'el' ( hard to explain), and over/underground
subway system. Then there were electric trolley buses, and finally
regular buses to get us within walking distance.
And, yes, any one of those modes of transportation sucks fuel big time
if nobody rides them. If they are full they are a good thing. SUV's and
single occupant soccer moms have messed up the equation.
Bill Baka
Actually a SUV would use about the same fuel as a current transit bus.
George, while SUVs are fuel guzzlers, they still get 2 - 3 times the
miles per gallon as a transit bus. The question is whether the
transit bus average loading is 3 or more times greater than the
average loading of an SUV in similar circumstances (urban area driving
only and dead head trips included). Any time there is carpooling
there probably is either dead head mileage or circuity, sometimes
both.
Gas is going to have to hit $3 a gallon and stay there for the soccer
mom crowd to realize they need a little Geo-Metro 3 banger just to run
to the store for a pack of smokes, or some shit paper or other silly
little errand. People are slow learners.
Bill Baka
It would need to more like $6 for anything much to happen. And besides,
people will always use their cars for shopping even if they take transit to
work, for no fuel savings, but then the bill goes to the public in terms of
subsidized fares.
Bill Baka
2007-03-05 22:19:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Gas is going to have to hit $3 a gallon and stay there for the soccer
mom crowd to realize they need a little Geo-Metro 3 banger just to run
to the store for a pack of smokes, or some shit paper or other silly
little errand. People are slow learners.
Bill Baka
It would need to more like $6 for anything much to happen. And besides,
people will always use their cars for shopping even if they take transit to
work, for no fuel savings, but then the bill goes to the public in terms of
subsidized fares.
Yeah,
The wallet forces people to make changes with less griping than any law
ever has. What's wrong with carpooling and soccer-momming an SUV and
using a toy car like the Geo for actual commuting? Some of these people
are so brain dead they say they can't afford 2 cars. HUH! They can
afford the gas and the average $30G's for an SUV, so why not $14,000 for
a new micro-car or even less for a used one?
Of course about 20% of Americans still smoke and about half drink
alcohol, not to mention the drug users, and they know it's bad for them
but they do it anyway.
I guess you can't argue with idiots, especially if they think they have
enough money to waste on those things.
Sigh.
Bill Baka
donquijote1954
2007-03-05 22:36:29 UTC
Permalink
:: I guess you can't argue with idiots, especially if they think they
:: have enough money to waste on those things.
:: Sigh.
:: Bill Baka
Is drinking alcohol bad for you?
Only if you drink and drive. Then it gets as dangerous as talking on
the phone.
Bill Baka
2007-03-06 01:03:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
:: I guess you can't argue with idiots, especially if they think they
:: have enough money to waste on those things.
:: Sigh.
:: Bill Baka
Is drinking alcohol bad for you?
Only if you drink and drive. Then it gets as dangerous as talking on
the phone.
Moral,
Only drink if it is offered to you, it is the good stuff, and you have a
good driver who doesn't drink (at least not more than one.).
Bill Baka
donquijote1954
2007-03-07 16:53:08 UTC
Permalink
"The Greasecar Vegetable Oil Conversion System is an auxiliary fuel
modification system that allows all diesel vehicles to run on straight
vegetable oil in any climate. Your Greasecar kit comes with everything
you need to convert your diesel vehicle to run on vegetable oil."

http://www.greasecar.com/index.cfm

Next thing they will make them run on banana. Bicycles run on banana
and water for a good while.
George Conklin
2007-03-06 11:15:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Gas is going to have to hit $3 a gallon and stay there for the soccer
mom crowd to realize they need a little Geo-Metro 3 banger just to run
to the store for a pack of smokes, or some shit paper or other silly
little errand. People are slow learners.
Bill Baka
It would need to more like $6 for anything much to happen. And besides,
people will always use their cars for shopping even if they take transit to
work, for no fuel savings, but then the bill goes to the public in terms of
subsidized fares.
Yeah,
The wallet forces people to make changes with less griping than any law
ever has. What's wrong with carpooling and soccer-momming an SUV and
using a toy car like the Geo for actual commuting?
Car pooling works only for workers who have a factory whistle to attend
to. White collar workers don't work those kind of fixed hours. Further, you
need to have a car to leave at home if you car pool. The law is set up to
make sure it fails.



Some of these people
Post by Bill Baka
are so brain dead they say they can't afford 2 cars. HUH! They can
afford the gas and the average $30G's for an SUV, so why not $14,000 for
a new micro-car or even less for a used one?
Not suitable for car pooling anyway.
Post by Bill Baka
Of course about 20% of Americans still smoke and about half drink
alcohol, not to mention the drug users, and they know it's bad for them
but they do it anyway.
I guess you can't argue with idiots, especially if they think they have
enough money to waste on those things.
Sigh.
Bill Baka
Actually drinking is good for you.
Curtis L. Russell
2007-03-06 13:40:00 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:15:20 GMT, "George Conklin"
Post by George Conklin
Actually drinking is good for you.
Actually, drinking may be good for you.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
Dane Buson
2007-03-06 20:00:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Yeah, The wallet forces people to make changes with less griping than
any law ever has. What's wrong with carpooling and soccer-momming an
SUV and using a toy car like the Geo for actual commuting?
Car pooling works only for workers who have a factory whistle to
attend to. White collar workers don't work those kind of fixed
hours.
Hmm, I'll have to tell the van pool people at my work
whiter-than-white-collar job that they can't possibly be getting to work
that way. It must be teleportation. I'll have to ask them how they do
that.
Post by George Conklin
Further, you need to have a car to leave at home if you car
pool. The law is set up to make sure it fails.
Errr, now this part I don't get. Why do you need to leave a car at
home?
--
Dane Buson - ***@unixbigots.org
The question is, why are politicians so eager to be president? What is it
about the job that makes it worth revealing, on national television, that
you have the ethical standards of a slime-coated piece of industrial waste?
-- Dave Barry, "On Presidential Politics"
Bill Baka
2007-03-06 22:12:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dane Buson
Post by George Conklin
Yeah, The wallet forces people to make changes with less griping than
any law ever has. What's wrong with carpooling and soccer-momming an
SUV and using a toy car like the Geo for actual commuting?
Car pooling works only for workers who have a factory whistle to
attend to. White collar workers don't work those kind of fixed
hours.
Hey,
I worked at one of those whiter than white collar jobs, and guess what I
wore to work...Tee shirt, jeans, ans sneakers. Any time I had to deal
with plant visitors I just told them I was the top engineer on my
project and that I wasn't going to wear a suit and tie to crawl behind
and inside some of the machines I worked on. Hands on, and they bought
that, and if they tried to challenge my intellect or grasp of the
situation I had plenty of big words to put them down with. Sales types
have a big ego but usually nothing to back it up.
Post by Dane Buson
Hmm, I'll have to tell the van pool people at my work
whiter-than-white-collar job that they can't possibly be getting to work
that way. It must be teleportation. I'll have to ask them how they do
that.
Must be magic. I can't imagine 2 or more executive types stuck in a car
with each other for more than 2 minutes without an argument breaking out.
Post by Dane Buson
Post by George Conklin
Further, you need to have a car to leave at home if you car
pool. The law is set up to make sure it fails.
Errr, now this part I don't get. Why do you need to leave a car at
home?
A small car for personal short errands?
Bill Baka
Dane Buson
2007-03-07 18:01:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Dane Buson
Hmm, I'll have to tell the van pool people at my work
whiter-than-white-collar job that they can't possibly be getting to
work that way. It must be teleportation. I'll have to ask them how
they do that.
Must be magic. I can't imagine 2 or more executive types stuck in a
car with each other for more than 2 minutes without an argument
breaking out.
I'm not sure if there are any executives involved. Programmers, QA
people, other similar people AFAIK. Of course one of the guys involved
Vanpools because he lives on Bainbridge island and commutes to Bellevue
for work. Two hours each way. His house is nice and all, but I still
think he is completely nuts.

But at least he can read for most of the trip instead of being stuck
driving a car.
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Dane Buson
Errr, now this part I don't get. Why do you need to leave a car at
home?
A small car for personal short errands? Bill Baka
/scratches head

I thought that that's what the Xtracycle is for?

/looks quizically at the audience
--
Dane Buson - ***@unixbigots.org
"Humor is a drug which it's the fashion to abuse."
-- William Gilbert
Bill Baka
2007-03-08 02:58:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dane Buson
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Dane Buson
Hmm, I'll have to tell the van pool people at my work
whiter-than-white-collar job that they can't possibly be getting to
work that way. It must be teleportation. I'll have to ask them how
they do that.
Must be magic. I can't imagine 2 or more executive types stuck in a
car with each other for more than 2 minutes without an argument
breaking out.
I'm not sure if there are any executives involved. Programmers, QA
people, other similar people AFAIK. Of course one of the guys involved
Vanpools because he lives on Bainbridge island and commutes to Bellevue
for work. Two hours each way. His house is nice and all, but I still
think he is completely nuts.
Ditto that. 4 hours of driving must mean his family really sucks or he
is single and work is his life.
Post by Dane Buson
But at least he can read for most of the trip instead of being stuck
driving a car.
20 hours of reading the newspaper every week?????
Post by Dane Buson
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Dane Buson
Errr, now this part I don't get. Why do you need to leave a car at
home?
A small car for personal short errands? Bill Baka
/scratches head
I thought that that's what the Xtracycle is for?
/looks quizically at the audience
You know, those trips where you have to buy something too big for a bike
but too small for a van/SUV.
Bill Baka
Bill Baka
2007-03-06 22:05:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Gas is going to have to hit $3 a gallon and stay there for the soccer
mom crowd to realize they need a little Geo-Metro 3 banger just to run
to the store for a pack of smokes, or some shit paper or other silly
little errand. People are slow learners.
Bill Baka
It would need to more like $6 for anything much to happen. And besides,
people will always use their cars for shopping even if they take transit
to
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
work, for no fuel savings, but then the bill goes to the public in terms
of
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
subsidized fares.
Yeah,
The wallet forces people to make changes with less griping than any law
ever has. What's wrong with carpooling and soccer-momming an SUV and
using a toy car like the Geo for actual commuting?
Car pooling works only for workers who have a factory whistle to attend
to. White collar workers don't work those kind of fixed hours. Further, you
need to have a car to leave at home if you car pool. The law is set up to
make sure it fails.
Last year I worked a contract job with a friend of mine and we rode
together in his Kia SUV/truck/4X4 and saved about 1/3 of the gas we
would have used by driving separately. This was only due to his Kia
getting 25 MPG and my Mazda getting 33 MPG. He is 6'8" tall and
physically couldn't fit in my Mazda, so there was a good reason to take
his bigger Kia.
Post by George Conklin
Some of these people
Post by Bill Baka
are so brain dead they say they can't afford 2 cars. HUH! They can
afford the gas and the average $30G's for an SUV, so why not $14,000 for
a new micro-car or even less for a used one?
Not suitable for car pooling anyway.
Even 2 people in a small car is a car pool, plus working at the same
place gives you a big edge. If the boss knows you ride together he also
knows if he pulls the overtime trick on one of us he will have to pay
overtime to the other for sticking around. At least that is how me and
my over sized friend did it.
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Of course about 20% of Americans still smoke and about half drink
alcohol, not to mention the drug users, and they know it's bad for them
but they do it anyway.
I guess you can't argue with idiots, especially if they think they have
enough money to waste on those things.
Sigh.
Bill Baka
Actually drinking is good for you.
After 5 minutes in this group I need one.
Bill Baka
Curtis L. Russell
2007-03-07 14:36:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Even 2 people in a small car is a car pool, plus working at the same
place gives you a big edge. If the boss knows you ride together he also
knows if he pulls the overtime trick on one of us he will have to pay
overtime to the other for sticking around. At least that is how me and
my over sized friend did it.
No, he doesn't have to pay your friend overtime to 'stick around'. Not
in any state in the U.S.A. And I've worked with certified payrolls for
probably around a hundred different union jobs, and that was never
part of the work rules - which wouldn't likely apply to contract
employees.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
Bill Baka
2007-03-08 02:55:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Curtis L. Russell
Post by Bill Baka
Even 2 people in a small car is a car pool, plus working at the same
place gives you a big edge. If the boss knows you ride together he also
knows if he pulls the overtime trick on one of us he will have to pay
overtime to the other for sticking around. At least that is how me and
my over sized friend did it.
No, he doesn't have to pay your friend overtime to 'stick around'. Not
in any state in the U.S.A. And I've worked with certified payrolls for
probably around a hundred different union jobs, and that was never
part of the work rules - which wouldn't likely apply to contract
employees.
Yes he did. Maybe not legally but my friend was high enough ranking that
he could say "Pay Bill too, or we are both going home.". After being
there 14 years they could not afford to piss Dan off. He was the only
one who knew were the bailing wire held the machines together.
Bill Baka
Post by Curtis L. Russell
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
Curtis L. Russell
2007-03-08 13:27:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Yes he did. Maybe not legally but my friend was high enough ranking that
he could say "Pay Bill too, or we are both going home.". After being
there 14 years they could not afford to piss Dan off. He was the only
one who knew were the bailing wire held the machines together.
Bill Baka
Which makes it an incredibly poorly run business. People die every day
and relying on the same person after 14 years to that extent is simply
stupid. It also makes it somewhat unusual - with all the changes in
that area, to think that their systems are so moribund that the same
person is the one that holds it together with bailing wire. I'm
surprised they can afford to pay anyone anything.

Then, again, a manager that is paying for work not done is an idiot
anyway. I'd want my money up front.

Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
Bill Baka
2007-03-08 16:30:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Curtis L. Russell
Post by Bill Baka
Yes he did. Maybe not legally but my friend was high enough ranking that
he could say "Pay Bill too, or we are both going home.". After being
there 14 years they could not afford to piss Dan off. He was the only
one who knew were the bailing wire held the machines together.
Bill Baka
Which makes it an incredibly poorly run business. People die every day
and relying on the same person after 14 years to that extent is simply
stupid. It also makes it somewhat unusual - with all the changes in
that area, to think that their systems are so moribund that the same
person is the one that holds it together with bailing wire. I'm
surprised they can afford to pay anyone anything.
Then, again, a manager that is paying for work not done is an idiot
anyway. I'd want my money up front.
It was upper management, which in the case of this company has been so
incompetent that they are closing the doors in a few months. In the 3
months that I worked there as a maintenance electrician I saw that the
boss of the maintenance shop was fairly competent but had to take his
fair share of BS from the 2 higher managers. They finally fired the in
between manager who was responsible for many of the plant operation
problems, but the top guy who was a complete idiot and a friend or
relative of the big corporate bosses kept his job long enough to trash
what was left of the company. Sometimes a company can live through bad
management, but 14 years of it can take down even a once very profitable
business.
Bill Baka
Post by Curtis L. Russell
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...
nash
2007-03-07 18:03:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Gas is going to have to hit $3 a gallon and stay there for the soccer
mom crowd to realize they need a little Geo-Metro 3 banger just to run
to the store for a pack of smokes, or some shit paper or other silly
little errand. People are slow learners.
Bill Baka
It would need to more like $6 for anything much to happen. And besides,
people will always use their cars for shopping even if they take transit
to
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
work, for no fuel savings, but then the bill goes to the public in terms
of
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
subsidized fares.
Yeah,
The wallet forces people to make changes with less griping than any law
ever has. What's wrong with carpooling and soccer-momming an SUV and
using a toy car like the Geo for actual commuting?
Car pooling works only for workers who have a factory whistle to attend
to. White collar workers don't work those kind of fixed hours. Further, you
need to have a car to leave at home if you car pool. The law is set up to
make sure it fails.
Last year I worked a contract job with a friend of mine and we rode
together in his Kia SUV/truck/4X4 and saved about 1/3 of the gas we would
have used by driving separately. This was only due to his Kia getting 25
MPG and my Mazda getting 33 MPG. He is 6'8" tall and physically couldn't
fit in my Mazda, so there was a good reason to take his bigger Kia.
Post by George Conklin
Some of these people
Post by Bill Baka
are so brain dead they say they can't afford 2 cars. HUH! They can
afford the gas and the average $30G's for an SUV, so why not $14,000 for
a new micro-car or even less for a used one?
Not suitable for car pooling anyway.
Even 2 people in a small car is a car pool, plus working at the same place
gives you a big edge. If the boss knows you ride together he also knows if
he pulls the overtime trick on one of us he will have to pay overtime to
the other for sticking around. At least that is how me and my over sized
friend did it.
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Of course about 20% of Americans still smoke and about half drink
alcohol, not to mention the drug users, and they know it's bad for them
but they do it anyway.
I guess you can't argue with idiots, especially if they think they have
enough money to waste on those things.
Sigh.
Bill Baka
Actually drinking is good for you.
After 5 minutes in this group I need one.
Bill Baka
I would have to agree with you on that.
Zen
Matthew T. Russotto
2007-03-08 01:28:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Gas is going to have to hit $3 a gallon and stay there for the soccer
mom crowd to realize they need a little Geo-Metro 3 banger just to run
to the store for a pack of smokes, or some shit paper or other silly
little errand. People are slow learners.
Your soccer mom (and husband or perhaps ex-) is paying a mortgage on a
$500,000+ McMansion, has two or more car payments, is paying
for private tutoring or private school for some number of her
offspring, probably private soccer lessons as well, and possibly
college for the older ones. $3 gas is lost in the noise.
--
There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
result in a fully-depreciated one.
Bill Baka
2007-03-08 03:00:31 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matthew T. Russotto
Post by Bill Baka
Gas is going to have to hit $3 a gallon and stay there for the soccer
mom crowd to realize they need a little Geo-Metro 3 banger just to run
to the store for a pack of smokes, or some shit paper or other silly
little errand. People are slow learners.
Your soccer mom (and husband or perhaps ex-) is paying a mortgage on a
$500,000+ McMansion, has two or more car payments, is paying
for private tutoring or private school for some number of her
offspring, probably private soccer lessons as well, and possibly
college for the older ones. $3 gas is lost in the noise.
Yeah,
And a lot of them that bought those $350,000 mini mansions 40 miles from
work are now bankrupt and foreclosed since their property value fell
through the floor over the last year. How much equity in their house?
About negative $100K.
Bill Baka
Baxter
2007-03-08 04:32:55 UTC
Permalink
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Matthew T. Russotto
Post by Bill Baka
Gas is going to have to hit $3 a gallon and stay there for the soccer
mom crowd to realize they need a little Geo-Metro 3 banger just to run
to the store for a pack of smokes, or some shit paper or other silly
little errand. People are slow learners.
Your soccer mom (and husband or perhaps ex-) is paying a mortgage on a
$500,000+ McMansion, has two or more car payments, is paying
for private tutoring or private school for some number of her
offspring, probably private soccer lessons as well, and possibly
college for the older ones. $3 gas is lost in the noise.
Yeah,
And a lot of them that bought those $350,000 mini mansions 40 miles from
work are now bankrupt and foreclosed since their property value fell
through the floor over the last year. How much equity in their house?
About negative $100K.
Strange how the anti-urbanists in this forum just can't understand that the
reason the McMansions 30 miles from town are so cheap is that people really
would rather have something in town - but can't afford it.
Bill Baka
2007-03-08 16:23:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl Hunt
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Matthew T. Russotto
Post by Bill Baka
Gas is going to have to hit $3 a gallon and stay there for the soccer
mom crowd to realize they need a little Geo-Metro 3 banger just to run
to the store for a pack of smokes, or some shit paper or other silly
little errand. People are slow learners.
Your soccer mom (and husband or perhaps ex-) is paying a mortgage on a
$500,000+ McMansion, has two or more car payments, is paying
for private tutoring or private school for some number of her
offspring, probably private soccer lessons as well, and possibly
college for the older ones. $3 gas is lost in the noise.
Yeah,
And a lot of them that bought those $350,000 mini mansions 40 miles from
work are now bankrupt and foreclosed since their property value fell
through the floor over the last year. How much equity in their house?
About negative $100K.
Strange how the anti-urbanists in this forum just can't understand that the
reason the McMansions 30 miles from town are so cheap is that people really
would rather have something in town - but can't afford it.
The difference is more than made up for when living in town. Spend more
on the house and less (maybe nothing) on new cars, gas, insurance, etc.
Spending 2-4 hours a day driving makes no sense to me.
Of course these same people who got foreclosed on in only a year went
nuts with 2 SUV's, and even dome had riding lawn mowers for their 20' by
30' patches of grass. Did I feel sorry for them when they went belly up
due to overspending? Nope.
Bill Baka
George Conklin
2007-03-05 21:36:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Clark F Morris
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 12:29:39 GMT, "George Conklin"
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by Clark F Morris
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Only if nobody rides them. When I was a kid in the Chicago area I could
go anywhere on a weekend with a travel buddy of mine. We took the train
into downtown, then the 'el' ( hard to explain), and over/underground
subway system. Then there were electric trolley buses, and finally
regular buses to get us within walking distance.
And, yes, any one of those modes of transportation sucks fuel big time
if nobody rides them. If they are full they are a good thing. SUV's and
single occupant soccer moms have messed up the equation.
Bill Baka
Actually a SUV would use about the same fuel as a current transit bus.
George, while SUVs are fuel guzzlers, they still get 2 - 3 times the
miles per gallon as a transit bus. The question is whether the
transit bus average loading is 3 or more times greater than the
average loading of an SUV in similar circumstances (urban area driving
only and dead head trips included). Any time there is carpooling
there probably is either dead head mileage or circuity, sometimes
both.
The car cannot drive itself back to the starting point with no driver.
The whole point of car pooling is to park the car at work. The AVERAGE
loads of transit buses and cars shows that the current SUVs and tranit buses
are about equal in fuel economy. Otherwise, the car beats both.
Bill Baka
2007-03-05 19:26:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Only if nobody rides them. When I was a kid in the Chicago area I could
go anywhere on a weekend with a travel buddy of mine. We took the train
into downtown, then the 'el' ( hard to explain), and over/underground
subway system. Then there were electric trolley buses, and finally
regular buses to get us within walking distance.
And, yes, any one of those modes of transportation sucks fuel big time
if nobody rides them. If they are full they are a good thing. SUV's and
single occupant soccer moms have messed up the equation.
Bill Baka
Actually a SUV would use about the same fuel as a current transit bus.
If it was electric the only defense I can make is that it had better
have some dame good regenerative braking. Then all that mass that had to
be accelerated could charge the batteries again during the stop.
Mass transit is the one place where actual full electrics do make sense.
Since they almost never make it over about 35 MPH in the city there
would be very little in the higher speed move the air and use power mode.
Getting this electricity from a central (clean) power plant would make a
lot more sense than the current non-regenerative and smoky diesels.
A multi million dollar power plant is going to make more power per ppm
of pollutant than ANY car ever will.
No jokes about Hydrogen power plants either.
Bill Baka
Daryl Hunt
2007-03-05 20:30:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Only if nobody rides them. When I was a kid in the Chicago area I could
go anywhere on a weekend with a travel buddy of mine. We took the train
into downtown, then the 'el' ( hard to explain), and over/underground
subway system. Then there were electric trolley buses, and finally
regular buses to get us within walking distance.
And, yes, any one of those modes of transportation sucks fuel big time
if nobody rides them. If they are full they are a good thing. SUV's and
single occupant soccer moms have messed up the equation.
Bill Baka
Actually a SUV would use about the same fuel as a current transit bus.
If it was electric the only defense I can make is that it had better have
some dame good regenerative braking. Then all that mass that had to be
accelerated could charge the batteries again during the stop.
Mass transit is the one place where actual full electrics do make sense.
Since they almost never make it over about 35 MPH in the city there would
be very little in the higher speed move the air and use power mode.
Getting this electricity from a central (clean) power plant would make a
lot more sense than the current non-regenerative and smoky diesels.
A multi million dollar power plant is going to make more power per ppm of
pollutant than ANY car ever will.
We run and export Hydroelectric power from here. We don't use Coal or Gas
to make our power. This is the cleanest electricity you are going to get
save for Solor or Wind. By a certain year, all electric power will be from
either wind or solar in this state. We do ship coal to the east and west
coast for your power plants though. The only place we use that coal on a
large scale basis is in just a couple of Refineries to make gas and diesel.
Electricity to us is cheaper than yours and clean.

Okay, that being said, Regenerative Braking is only useful on large heavy
vehicles like Trains and Buses. The mass must be sufficient to get a decent
return. Much like a Jake Brake on a Truck, regen braking helps to either
slow the vehicle down or just put drag to keep it from becoming a runaway on
a downhill run. It also would help stopping a Bus from 35 mph along with
the brakes. Again, the bus has the mass.

SUVs, Cars and 2 wheelers don't have the mass and the regen braking would
cost you more than it would return. Attempting to rely on the regen braking
for returned electic power is foolish. Now, if you use it for drag on the
car or SUV then it would be welcome since it would be like dropping down one
gear. But don't look for any appreicative return of electric power.

Now, on to Bikes, at 3 bucks a gallon it's time to turn up the heat on our
legaslatures once again. When it dropped below 2 bucks we lost any momentum
we had. It's time to fire up the embers under the politicians asse.
No jokes about Hydrogen power plants either.
You mean I can't do even one? Sheesh, this is a tough audience.
Baxter
2007-03-07 00:54:00 UTC
Permalink
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by George Conklin
Actually a SUV would use about the same fuel as a current transit bus.
And carries a lot fewer passengers.
donquijote1954
2007-03-07 17:08:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl Hunt
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by George Conklin
Actually a SUV would use about the same fuel as a current transit bus.
And carries a lot fewer passengers.
SUVs usually carry few people with big egos. The product of...

"We are all raised in an aggressive, competitive, egotistical society
[read SUVs], and these attitudes are not left behind. Cooperation can
be difficult [read buses].

Human beings are genetically designed to live in small groups where
group members are vitally significant to each other. Part of the
alienation and unhappiness in society is because family units are too
small [capitalist jungle], and other groupings too large [read
communist herd]."

http://www.mudsmith.net/moora/

This confirms what I've saying all along. Neither individualist jungle
nor herd are the best life for social monkeys. They would be inclined
to bikes and buses.
Matthew T. Russotto
2007-03-08 01:07:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Only if nobody rides them.
But you have to have the near-empty runs or the system becomes
less useful overall -- and as a result ridership goes down even on the
popular runs.
--
There's no such thing as a free lunch, but certain accounting practices can
result in a fully-depreciated one.
Doc O'Leary
2007-03-08 18:42:13 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matthew T. Russotto
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Only if nobody rides them.
But you have to have the near-empty runs or the system becomes
less useful overall -- and as a result ridership goes down even on the
popular runs.
No, that's just another failure of urban planning. Modern technology
could easily be used to help schedule the frequency and size of transit
vehicles. It should even be possible possible to provide door-to-door
service for the same cost per mile as fuel alone (say around $3 for 25
miles), but somehow city planners got focussed on moving the cars
instead of the people.
--
My personal UDP list: 127.0.0.1, 4ax.com, buzzardnews.com, googlegroups.com,
heapnode.com, localhost, x-privat.org
nash
2007-03-08 18:51:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Doc O'Leary
Post by Matthew T. Russotto
Post by Bill Baka
Post by George Conklin
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Only if nobody rides them.
But you have to have the near-empty runs or the system becomes
less useful overall -- and as a result ridership goes down even on the
popular runs.
No, that's just another failure of urban planning. Modern technology
could easily be used to help schedule the frequency and size of transit
vehicles. It should even be possible possible to provide door-to-door
service for the same cost per mile as fuel alone (say around $3 for 25
miles), but somehow city planners got focussed on moving the cars
instead of the people.
--
My personal UDP list: 127.0.0.1, 4ax.com, buzzardnews.com,
googlegroups.com,
heapnode.com, localhost, x-privat.org
For what it's worth I agree with the Doc
donquijote1954
2007-03-08 20:36:58 UTC
Permalink
Talking into account that most buses still pollute --if so much less--
here's another T-shirt that emphasizes that buses are unselfish. Yep,
the same way SUVs are an expression of selfishness and egomaniacal
behavior, buses are an expression of good social behavior.

No reason to hide behind tinted windows like SUV owners do...

http://www.zazzle.com/product/235865034222897517

Brian Huntley
2007-03-05 05:13:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Does your proclamation factor in the extra time those cars would be on
the road if each of those morning rush hour transit buses were
replaced by 80-100 cars? Or the fuel cost cars themselves, for that
matter?

And their parking, in terms of distance and time and cost? How's a
fuel cell going to help those things? Heck, a lot of 'efficient' fuel
systems aren't even allowed to park in high-density underground lots.

Transit buses may be inefficient in some places, but in others, like
my downtown, you have to look at the cars and ask "why bother?"

Fastest to slowest in Toronto for distances between 6 and 100 blocks:
Subway, bus, bicycle, streetcar, car. In really bad weather, insert
"pedestrian" between bike and streetcar (up to 50 blocks, anyway.)
Daryl Hunt
2007-03-05 01:37:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Not all, I think I read somewhere where a city went to Electrics.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 3877 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
George Conklin
2007-03-05 12:26:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Not all, I think I read somewhere where a city went to Electrics.
Ok, that exports pollution to rural areas. And of course a plug-in hybrid
electric car would meet about 90% of the commuting needs of America.
Pat
2007-03-06 17:42:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we
cruise
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Not all, I think I read somewhere where a city went to Electrics.
Ok, that exports pollution to rural areas. And of course a plug-in hybrid
electric car would meet about 90% of the commuting needs of America.
This whole Tango and electric car stuff is a load of BS. Period. It
is all a bunch of tree-hugging hyporcrits who want to feel good about
the environments without actually have to do anything about it or be
inconvenienced. Period. There are solutions out there and they are
fairly simple. But it isn't this crap.

Electric cars? Guess what. Our electric grid is near capacity and
you want to plug your cars in? Great, you feel good about having an
expensive, stupid electric car while somebody is out building a coal
or oil plant to generate electricity and ship it to you. Okay, they
might be able to put out less pollution but it is still coal or oil.
Electricity doesn't just come out of you plug. It does, however, grow
on trees. Okay, no really, but fuel grows in fields. If you want to
cut your dependence on fossil fuels, switch to vegetable oil. You
busses and trucks and cars can run on that. It's simple, less
pollution, and easily stops the dependence on fossils. Okay, don't
want that, go with bio-diesel.

Meanwhile, you little Tangos. They are nothing but publicity stunts.
They are okay for backup transportation in a city but that's about
it. But so is a motorcycle. Oh, but a motorcycle is "old technology"
and doesn't have the allure of a slick Tango. Yeah, that's my point.
If you people really gave a damn you be out riding motorcycles right
now. Plus you can throw on a trailer for groceries if you want.

Me? I don't ride public transportation and I drive a minivan. So
there you go. But we don't have public transporation and if we did,
it's be VERY wasteful because everyone around here has a car. And I
drive a van to SAVE gasoline. I haul lots of kids to and froe
practices and having a van that can carry 4 or 5 teens plus gear sure
beats taking two trips. But when the weather is nice and I have to go
somewhere, I ride one of my 3 motorcycles that range in gas milage
from about 35 mpg to about 100 mpg. And the less expensive the bike I
have, the better the gas mileage. Plus they take up very little
parking. But you know what, riding the most fuel efficient vehicle on
the road has NOTHING to do with gas mileage. They are just fun to
ride. My smallest bike doesn't have much of a motor, but by 450 cc
bike that is 25 years old still gets 70 mph and can out accelerate and
outperform most cars on the road.

So if you want to do something about energy and efficiency and
pollution, go do it. But the whole "make it electric" arguement is
pretty stupid because all you are doing is changing where the fuel is
burned. And none of that stuff about "hydro" because all hydro is
used to 100% capacity and any incrimental electricity is fossil. Oh,
so you want more hydro. I'm fine with that. But I live in the
country because I like it and I don't want any more valleys flooded so
people in cities can go do stupid things. Go damn up your own
rivers. Go put a damn across the Hudson. NYC has so many reseviours
upstate they they have already devastated the Catskills. Pretty lakes
you say? Yeah, but what about the people that used to live there who
were flooded out of their homes. What about the rivers that are gone
and the trout that aren't there? So maybe nuclear is a good thing.
It might be. In 30 or 40 years when they get done cleaning up the
nuclear reprocessing plant 30 miles from here, we'll discuss it.
Actually I don't mind it, so if you want nuclear for Long Island or
NYC, go put it on Long Island or NYC. Oh, that's right, they tried
that and the people didnt want it. So if you want nuclear, why do YOU
want the electricity but you want ME to deal with the consequences? I
don't dump crap in your city so you keep your crap out of my rural
area.

As for bicycles? A great idea. Probably everyone in NYC and most
other cities should have one or a scooter or small motorcyle. But
they are not the answer for everyone.

$6 gas. What about it. I'll go down on the Rez and buy it for $5.
And as soon as the price of oil exceeds that of cooking oil, bio
diesel sure will look sweat. Okay, the roads will smell like a
chinese restaurant, but some people will like that.

Fuel cells might use gas more efficently, but they are still using
gas. So what's the big deal. Moving a car that some drives in a city
from 30 mpg to 50 saves 13 gallon of fuel over 1000 miles. Moving a
truck from 8 mpg to 12 mpg saves 42 gallons. Biodiesel would save 125
gallons of oil.

Sorry for the rant, but if you are going to save the world, be
practical and do thing that really make a difference, not just get
what you don't want to see out of your sight.

Sorry for the rant, but this
Bill Baka
2007-03-06 21:58:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pat
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we
cruise
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Not all, I think I read somewhere where a city went to Electrics.
Ok, that exports pollution to rural areas. And of course a plug-in hybrid
electric car would meet about 90% of the commuting needs of America.
This whole Tango and electric car stuff is a load of BS. Period. It
is all a bunch of tree-hugging hyporcrits who want to feel good about
the environments without actually have to do anything about it or be
inconvenienced. Period. There are solutions out there and they are
fairly simple. But it isn't this crap.
Electric cars? Guess what. Our electric grid is near capacity and
you want to plug your cars in? Great, you feel good about having an
expensive, stupid electric car while somebody is out building a coal
or oil plant to generate electricity and ship it to you. Okay, they
might be able to put out less pollution but it is still coal or oil.
Electricity doesn't just come out of you plug. It does, however, grow
on trees. Okay, no really, but fuel grows in fields. If you want to
cut your dependence on fossil fuels, switch to vegetable oil. You
busses and trucks and cars can run on that. It's simple, less
pollution, and easily stops the dependence on fossils. Okay, don't
want that, go with bio-diesel.
REPUGLICAN ALERT!!!
Post by Pat
Meanwhile, you little Tangos. They are nothing but publicity stunts.
They are okay for backup transportation in a city but that's about
it. But so is a motorcycle. Oh, but a motorcycle is "old technology"
and doesn't have the allure of a slick Tango. Yeah, that's my point.
If you people really gave a damn you be out riding motorcycles right
now. Plus you can throw on a trailer for groceries if you want.
Me? I don't ride public transportation and I drive a minivan. So
there you go. But we don't have public transporation and if we did,
it's be VERY wasteful because everyone around here has a car. And I
drive a van to SAVE gasoline. I haul lots of kids to and froe
practices and having a van that can carry 4 or 5 teens plus gear sure
beats taking two trips. But when the weather is nice and I have to go
somewhere, I ride one of my 3 motorcycles that range in gas milage
from about 35 mpg to about 100 mpg. And the less expensive the bike I
have, the better the gas mileage. Plus they take up very little
parking. But you know what, riding the most fuel efficient vehicle on
the road has NOTHING to do with gas mileage. They are just fun to
ride. My smallest bike doesn't have much of a motor, but by 450 cc
bike that is 25 years old still gets 70 mph and can out accelerate and
outperform most cars on the road.
So if you want to do something about energy and efficiency and
pollution, go do it. But the whole "make it electric" arguement is
pretty stupid because all you are doing is changing where the fuel is
burned. And none of that stuff about "hydro" because all hydro is
used to 100% capacity and any incrimental electricity is fossil. Oh,
so you want more hydro. I'm fine with that. But I live in the
country because I like it and I don't want any more valleys flooded so
people in cities can go do stupid things. Go damn up your own
rivers. Go put a damn across the Hudson. NYC has so many reseviours
upstate they they have already devastated the Catskills. Pretty lakes
you say? Yeah, but what about the people that used to live there who
were flooded out of their homes. What about the rivers that are gone
and the trout that aren't there? So maybe nuclear is a good thing.
It might be. In 30 or 40 years when they get done cleaning up the
nuclear reprocessing plant 30 miles from here, we'll discuss it.
Actually I don't mind it, so if you want nuclear for Long Island or
NYC, go put it on Long Island or NYC. Oh, that's right, they tried
that and the people didnt want it. So if you want nuclear, why do YOU
want the electricity but you want ME to deal with the consequences? I
don't dump crap in your city so you keep your crap out of my rural
area.
As for bicycles? A great idea. Probably everyone in NYC and most
other cities should have one or a scooter or small motorcyle. But
they are not the answer for everyone.
$6 gas. What about it. I'll go down on the Rez and buy it for $5.
And as soon as the price of oil exceeds that of cooking oil, bio
diesel sure will look sweat. Okay, the roads will smell like a
chinese restaurant, but some people will like that.
Fuel cells might use gas more efficently, but they are still using
gas. So what's the big deal. Moving a car that some drives in a city
from 30 mpg to 50 saves 13 gallon of fuel over 1000 miles. Moving a
truck from 8 mpg to 12 mpg saves 42 gallons. Biodiesel would save 125
gallons of oil.
Sorry for the rant, but if you are going to save the world, be
practical and do thing that really make a difference, not just get
what you don't want to see out of your sight.
Sorry for the rant, but this
Dude,
Slow down.
The idea for electric cars should be that if one just has to own an SUV
(soccer mom or guy who needs the hauling space) then they should have
one. They should also be required to buy a little tiny, barely can get
into it, econo-box for running around town to do those non-hauling
trips. The little one can be a total electric that you plug in at night
and never go over 30 miles in one day.
The insurance companies could help by making large vehicles pay a much
bigger fee for comprehensive collision liability for the SUV and almost
nothing for the little econo box.
The bottom line is that if you are an ecology abuser you get to pay.
Bill Baka
Daryl Hunt
2007-03-07 03:19:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Pat
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we
cruise
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Not all, I think I read somewhere where a city went to Electrics.
Ok, that exports pollution to rural areas. And of course a plug-in hybrid
electric car would meet about 90% of the commuting needs of America.
This whole Tango and electric car stuff is a load of BS. Period. It
is all a bunch of tree-hugging hyporcrits who want to feel good about
the environments without actually have to do anything about it or be
inconvenienced. Period. There are solutions out there and they are
fairly simple. But it isn't this crap.
Electric cars? Guess what. Our electric grid is near capacity and
you want to plug your cars in? Great, you feel good about having an
expensive, stupid electric car while somebody is out building a coal
or oil plant to generate electricity and ship it to you. Okay, they
might be able to put out less pollution but it is still coal or oil.
Electricity doesn't just come out of you plug. It does, however, grow
on trees. Okay, no really, but fuel grows in fields. If you want to
cut your dependence on fossil fuels, switch to vegetable oil. You
busses and trucks and cars can run on that. It's simple, less
pollution, and easily stops the dependence on fossils. Okay, don't
want that, go with bio-diesel.
REPUGLICAN ALERT!!!
Post by Pat
Meanwhile, you little Tangos. They are nothing but publicity stunts.
They are okay for backup transportation in a city but that's about
it. But so is a motorcycle. Oh, but a motorcycle is "old technology"
and doesn't have the allure of a slick Tango. Yeah, that's my point.
If you people really gave a damn you be out riding motorcycles right
now. Plus you can throw on a trailer for groceries if you want.
Me? I don't ride public transportation and I drive a minivan. So
there you go. But we don't have public transporation and if we did,
it's be VERY wasteful because everyone around here has a car. And I
drive a van to SAVE gasoline. I haul lots of kids to and froe
practices and having a van that can carry 4 or 5 teens plus gear sure
beats taking two trips. But when the weather is nice and I have to go
somewhere, I ride one of my 3 motorcycles that range in gas milage
from about 35 mpg to about 100 mpg. And the less expensive the bike I
have, the better the gas mileage. Plus they take up very little
parking. But you know what, riding the most fuel efficient vehicle on
the road has NOTHING to do with gas mileage. They are just fun to
ride. My smallest bike doesn't have much of a motor, but by 450 cc
bike that is 25 years old still gets 70 mph and can out accelerate and
outperform most cars on the road.
So if you want to do something about energy and efficiency and
pollution, go do it. But the whole "make it electric" arguement is
pretty stupid because all you are doing is changing where the fuel is
burned. And none of that stuff about "hydro" because all hydro is
used to 100% capacity and any incrimental electricity is fossil. Oh,
so you want more hydro. I'm fine with that. But I live in the
country because I like it and I don't want any more valleys flooded so
people in cities can go do stupid things. Go damn up your own
rivers. Go put a damn across the Hudson. NYC has so many reseviours
upstate they they have already devastated the Catskills. Pretty lakes
you say? Yeah, but what about the people that used to live there who
were flooded out of their homes. What about the rivers that are gone
and the trout that aren't there? So maybe nuclear is a good thing.
It might be. In 30 or 40 years when they get done cleaning up the
nuclear reprocessing plant 30 miles from here, we'll discuss it.
Actually I don't mind it, so if you want nuclear for Long Island or
NYC, go put it on Long Island or NYC. Oh, that's right, they tried
that and the people didnt want it. So if you want nuclear, why do YOU
want the electricity but you want ME to deal with the consequences? I
don't dump crap in your city so you keep your crap out of my rural
area.
As for bicycles? A great idea. Probably everyone in NYC and most
other cities should have one or a scooter or small motorcyle. But
they are not the answer for everyone.
$6 gas. What about it. I'll go down on the Rez and buy it for $5.
And as soon as the price of oil exceeds that of cooking oil, bio
diesel sure will look sweat. Okay, the roads will smell like a
chinese restaurant, but some people will like that.
Fuel cells might use gas more efficently, but they are still using
gas. So what's the big deal. Moving a car that some drives in a city
from 30 mpg to 50 saves 13 gallon of fuel over 1000 miles. Moving a
truck from 8 mpg to 12 mpg saves 42 gallons. Biodiesel would save 125
gallons of oil.
Sorry for the rant, but if you are going to save the world, be
practical and do thing that really make a difference, not just get
what you don't want to see out of your sight.
Sorry for the rant, but this
Dude,
Slow down.
The idea for electric cars should be that if one just has to own an SUV
(soccer mom or guy who needs the hauling space) then they should have one.
They should also be required to buy a little tiny, barely can get into it,
econo-box for running around town to do those non-hauling trips. The
little one can be a total electric that you plug in at night and never go
over 30 miles in one day.
The insurance companies could help by making large vehicles pay a much
bigger fee for comprehensive collision liability for the SUV and almost
nothing for the little econo box.
The bottom line is that if you are an ecology abuser you get to pay.
Bill Baka
Yes, and gas is heading back to over 3 bucks a gallon. Since the technology
is already here for the electric vehicles (I ride one myself and haven't
paid for fuel since Nov 2004) one would think that there might be somewhat
or greater of an incentive to get that ol electric bike, car, MC or MiniVan
going just by pluging it in. Our grid is well below needing help so we have
more than we need. Shoot, chances are, we sell some of it to where you are.
But I doubt if electric vehicles will bust many grids since the recharging
takes less than a normal lightbulb. Mine takes about 2 to 5 amp per hour.
That's many times less than a light bulb and about the same as a decent
clock radio.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 4131 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
Dane Buson
2007-03-07 19:07:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl Hunt
But I doubt if electric vehicles will bust many grids since the recharging
takes less than a normal lightbulb. Mine takes about 2 to 5 amp per hour.
That's many times less than a light bulb and about the same as a decent
clock radio.
Nitpick: What in the world are you using for lightbulbs? 2-5 amps at
110v means you're using 220-550 watt bulbs. Lighting up a lot of
stadiums are we? And of course, an additional thought is that I thought
a lot of the car chargers run on 220v, but 110v. Which would make for
440-1100 watts.

A better tack to take is that car charging could easily take place at
off-peak hours.
--
Dane Buson - ***@unixbigots.org
"Protecting the children is a good way to get a lot of adults
who cant stand up for themselves" -J. Stecher
Pat
2007-03-08 15:43:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Pat
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we
cruise
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Not all, I think I read somewhere where a city went to Electrics.
Ok, that exports pollution to rural areas. And of course a plug-in hybrid
electric car would meet about 90% of the commuting needs of America.
This whole Tango and electric car stuff is a load of BS. Period. It
is all a bunch of tree-hugging hyporcrits who want to feel good about
the environments without actually have to do anything about it or be
inconvenienced. Period. There are solutions out there and they are
fairly simple. But it isn't this crap.
Electric cars? Guess what. Our electric grid is near capacity and
you want to plug your cars in? Great, you feel good about having an
expensive, stupid electric car while somebody is out building a coal
or oil plant to generate electricity and ship it to you. Okay, they
might be able to put out less pollution but it is still coal or oil.
Electricity doesn't just come out of you plug. It does, however, grow
on trees. Okay, no really, but fuel grows in fields. If you want to
cut your dependence on fossil fuels, switch to vegetable oil. You
busses and trucks and cars can run on that. It's simple, less
pollution, and easily stops the dependence on fossils. Okay, don't
want that, go with bio-diesel.
REPUGLICAN ALERT!!!
Post by Pat
Meanwhile, you little Tangos. They are nothing but publicity stunts.
They are okay for backup transportation in a city but that's about
it. But so is a motorcycle. Oh, but a motorcycle is "old technology"
and doesn't have the allure of a slick Tango. Yeah, that's my point.
If you people really gave a damn you be out riding motorcycles right
now. Plus you can throw on a trailer for groceries if you want.
Me? I don't ride public transportation and I drive a minivan. So
there you go. But we don't have public transporation and if we did,
it's be VERY wasteful because everyone around here has a car. And I
drive a van to SAVE gasoline. I haul lots of kids to and froe
practices and having a van that can carry 4 or 5 teens plus gear sure
beats taking two trips. But when the weather is nice and I have to go
somewhere, I ride one of my 3 motorcycles that range in gas milage
from about 35 mpg to about 100 mpg. And the less expensive the bike I
have, the better the gas mileage. Plus they take up very little
parking. But you know what, riding the most fuel efficient vehicle on
the road has NOTHING to do with gas mileage. They are just fun to
ride. My smallest bike doesn't have much of a motor, but by 450 cc
bike that is 25 years old still gets 70 mph and can out accelerate and
outperform most cars on the road.
So if you want to do something about energy and efficiency and
pollution, go do it. But the whole "make it electric" arguement is
pretty stupid because all you are doing is changing where the fuel is
burned. And none of that stuff about "hydro" because all hydro is
used to 100% capacity and any incrimental electricity is fossil. Oh,
so you want more hydro. I'm fine with that. But I live in the
country because I like it and I don't want any more valleys flooded so
people in cities can go do stupid things. Go damn up your own
rivers. Go put a damn across the Hudson. NYC has so many reseviours
upstate they they have already devastated the Catskills. Pretty lakes
you say? Yeah, but what about the people that used to live there who
were flooded out of their homes. What about the rivers that are gone
and the trout that aren't there? So maybe nuclear is a good thing.
It might be. In 30 or 40 years when they get done cleaning up the
nuclear reprocessing plant 30 miles from here, we'll discuss it.
Actually I don't mind it, so if you want nuclear for Long Island or
NYC, go put it on Long Island or NYC. Oh, that's right, they tried
that and the people didnt want it. So if you want nuclear, why do YOU
want the electricity but you want ME to deal with the consequences? I
don't dump crap in your city so you keep your crap out of my rural
area.
As for bicycles? A great idea. Probably everyone in NYC and most
other cities should have one or a scooter or small motorcyle. But
they are not the answer for everyone.
$6 gas. What about it. I'll go down on the Rez and buy it for $5.
And as soon as the price of oil exceeds that of cooking oil, bio
diesel sure will look sweat. Okay, the roads will smell like a
chinese restaurant, but some people will like that.
Fuel cells might use gas more efficently, but they are still using
gas. So what's the big deal. Moving a car that some drives in a city
from 30 mpg to 50 saves 13 gallon of fuel over 1000 miles. Moving a
truck from 8 mpg to 12 mpg saves 42 gallons. Biodiesel would save 125
gallons of oil.
Sorry for the rant, but if you are going to save the world, be
practical and do thing that really make a difference, not just get
what you don't want to see out of your sight.
Sorry for the rant, but this
Dude,
Slow down.
The idea for electric cars should be that if one just has to own an SUV
(soccer mom or guy who needs the hauling space) then they should have one.
They should also be required to buy a little tiny, barely can get into it,
econo-box for running around town to do those non-hauling trips. The
little one can be a total electric that you plug in at night and never go
over 30 miles in one day.
The insurance companies could help by making large vehicles pay a much
bigger fee for comprehensive collision liability for the SUV and almost
nothing for the little econo box.
The bottom line is that if you are an ecology abuser you get to pay.
Bill Baka
Yes, and gas is heading back to over 3 bucks a gallon. Since the technology
is already here for the electric vehicles (I ride one myself and haven't
paid for fuel since Nov 2004) one would think that there might be somewhat
or greater of an incentive to get that ol electric bike, car, MC or MiniVan
going just by pluging it in. Our grid is well below needing help so we have
more than we need. Shoot, chances are, we sell some of it to where you are.
But I doubt if electric vehicles will bust many grids since the recharging
takes less than a normal lightbulb. Mine takes about 2 to 5 amp per hour.
That's many times less than a light bulb and about the same as a decent
clock radio.
Sure you've bought lots and lots of fuel. You've just bought it
somewhere else and given that area your pollution.

I'm not sure how an electric MC would work. Seems like it would be
awkward. Besides, you would Harley get their sound?

We have more that we need, sometimes, but we don't during peak and
that's the problem. Interestingly, were I live, we have winter peak,
not summer peak, so we don't contribute to the problem as much as all
of the folk who depend on AC to live through the summer. Of course,
it's 5F right now, snowing, and we have 2.5 feet of snow on the
ground.)

Finally, electric that needs recharging like you have would work for
most people around here. We have too many people traveling too far
for it to work. Tomorrow I'm going about 7.5 hours for a trip.
That's a long ways to go on a battery, esp. if you are using it to
heat the car (10F and 70mph wind chill). It might work in some areas,
but you're still burning something for electricity.

(side note, we are 100% hydro, but not for environmental reasons. our
muni electric buys it from Canada because it's cheap).

Rather than getting rid of cars, that aren't used all that much. Why
not just get rid of air conditioners. they are on all of the time and
use a huge amount of electricity.
Post by Daryl Hunt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 4131 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
Bill Baka
2007-03-08 16:01:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pat
Finally, electric that needs recharging like you have would work for
most people around here. We have too many people traveling too far
for it to work. Tomorrow I'm going about 7.5 hours for a trip.
That's a long ways to go on a battery, esp. if you are using it to
heat the car (10F and 70mph wind chill). It might work in some areas,
but you're still burning something for electricity.
(side note, we are 100% hydro, but not for environmental reasons. our
muni electric buys it from Canada because it's cheap).
Rather than getting rid of cars, that aren't used all that much. Why
not just get rid of air conditioners. they are on all of the time and
use a huge amount of electricity.
Try living in central California where 100's are common or Arkansas
where 98 degrees and 98% humidity makes sweating in the shade a sport.
Some places need A/C.
For the record I owned a huge 5,000 square foot house in Minnesota north
of the twin cities and it had 4 kinds of heat.
1. Propane forced air.
2. Electric baseboards.
3. Oil fired hot water radiators.
4. 2 wood burning stoves and a fireplace.
5. Even a fire place in the detached 1,000 square foot garage.
When it got to 25 below zero I used wood as much as possible but needed
to use the others when the wood ran out at about 3 in the morning.
Except for the wood which just required me to chop it, the rest cost
real money.
There are no free rides.
Bill Baka
Pat
2007-03-08 17:13:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Pat
Finally, electric that needs recharging like you have would work for
most people around here. We have too many people traveling too far
for it to work. Tomorrow I'm going about 7.5 hours for a trip.
That's a long ways to go on a battery, esp. if you are using it to
heat the car (10F and 70mph wind chill). It might work in some areas,
but you're still burning something for electricity.
(side note, we are 100% hydro, but not for environmental reasons. our
muni electric buys it from Canada because it's cheap).
Rather than getting rid of cars, that aren't used all that much. Why
not just get rid of air conditioners. they are on all of the time and
use a huge amount of electricity.
Try living in central California where 100's are common or Arkansas
where 98 degrees and 98% humidity makes sweating in the shade a sport.
Some places need A/C.
For the record I owned a huge 5,000 square foot house in Minnesota north
of the twin cities and it had 4 kinds of heat.
1. Propane forced air.
2. Electric baseboards.
3. Oil fired hot water radiators.
4. 2 wood burning stoves and a fireplace.
5. Even a fire place in the detached 1,000 square foot garage.
When it got to 25 below zero I used wood as much as possible but needed
to use the others when the wood ran out at about 3 in the morning.
Except for the wood which just required me to chop it, the rest cost
real money.
There are no free rides.
Bill Baka
That's exactly my point. AC allowed the development of California
and Arkansas and then people pitch about the energy usage an
pollution. If you want to do something real about pollution, move
somewhere that requires less energy to live. Even as it is,
electricity is notoriously inefficient. I heat my house from maybe
November to April (or so, depending on the year) and then use no power
for heating and cooling (other than cooking and hot water) for the
rest of the year. No energy usage is the only free ride. I use 1 fan
upstairs if it really hot out. It isn't cars that create the energy
crisis and pollution, it is AC. Its impact on society has been huge.
nash
2007-03-08 17:27:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pat
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Pat
Finally, electric that needs recharging like you have would work for
most people around here. We have too many people traveling too far
for it to work. Tomorrow I'm going about 7.5 hours for a trip.
That's a long ways to go on a battery, esp. if you are using it to
heat the car (10F and 70mph wind chill). It might work in some areas,
but you're still burning something for electricity.
(side note, we are 100% hydro, but not for environmental reasons. our
muni electric buys it from Canada because it's cheap).
Rather than getting rid of cars, that aren't used all that much. Why
not just get rid of air conditioners. they are on all of the time and
use a huge amount of electricity.
Try living in central California where 100's are common or Arkansas
where 98 degrees and 98% humidity makes sweating in the shade a sport.
Some places need A/C.
For the record I owned a huge 5,000 square foot house in Minnesota north
of the twin cities and it had 4 kinds of heat.
1. Propane forced air.
2. Electric baseboards.
3. Oil fired hot water radiators.
4. 2 wood burning stoves and a fireplace.
5. Even a fire place in the detached 1,000 square foot garage.
When it got to 25 below zero I used wood as much as possible but needed
to use the others when the wood ran out at about 3 in the morning.
Except for the wood which just required me to chop it, the rest cost
real money.
There are no free rides.
Bill Baka
That's exactly my point. AC allowed the development of California
and Arkansas and then people pitch about the energy usage an
pollution. If you want to do something real about pollution, move
somewhere that requires less energy to live. Even as it is,
electricity is notoriously inefficient. I heat my house from maybe
November to April (or so, depending on the year) and then use no power
for heating and cooling (other than cooking and hot water) for the
rest of the year. No energy usage is the only free ride. I use 1 fan
upstairs if it really hot out. It isn't cars that create the energy
crisis and pollution, it is AC. Its impact on society has been huge.
What do you mean pollution? Water vapor?
That is not decreasing the ozone and causing methane fires on top of
permafrost so the sea level rises 7 metres in decades not centuries.
Amy Blankenship
2007-03-08 17:40:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pat
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Pat
Finally, electric that needs recharging like you have would work for
most people around here. We have too many people traveling too far
for it to work. Tomorrow I'm going about 7.5 hours for a trip.
That's a long ways to go on a battery, esp. if you are using it to
heat the car (10F and 70mph wind chill). It might work in some areas,
but you're still burning something for electricity.
(side note, we are 100% hydro, but not for environmental reasons. our
muni electric buys it from Canada because it's cheap).
Rather than getting rid of cars, that aren't used all that much. Why
not just get rid of air conditioners. they are on all of the time and
use a huge amount of electricity.
Try living in central California where 100's are common or Arkansas
where 98 degrees and 98% humidity makes sweating in the shade a sport.
Some places need A/C.
For the record I owned a huge 5,000 square foot house in Minnesota north
of the twin cities and it had 4 kinds of heat.
1. Propane forced air.
2. Electric baseboards.
3. Oil fired hot water radiators.
4. 2 wood burning stoves and a fireplace.
5. Even a fire place in the detached 1,000 square foot garage.
When it got to 25 below zero I used wood as much as possible but needed
to use the others when the wood ran out at about 3 in the morning.
Except for the wood which just required me to chop it, the rest cost
real money.
There are no free rides.
Bill Baka
That's exactly my point. AC allowed the development of California
and Arkansas and then people pitch about the energy usage an
pollution. If you want to do something real about pollution, move
somewhere that requires less energy to live. Even as it is,
electricity is notoriously inefficient. I heat my house from maybe
November to April (or so, depending on the year) and then use no power
for heating and cooling (other than cooking and hot water) for the
rest of the year. No energy usage is the only free ride. I use 1 fan
upstairs if it really hot out. It isn't cars that create the energy
crisis and pollution, it is AC. Its impact on society has been huge.
So wouldn't you agree that farmland protection in warm areas (which often
are well-suited to growing crops) would also serve the purpose of preventing
the building of McMansions in those areas, which will have a legacy of
increased power consumption for at least 50 years?
Pat
2007-03-08 18:45:13 UTC
Permalink
On Mar 8, 12:40 pm, "Amy Blankenship"
Post by Amy Blankenship
Post by Pat
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Pat
Finally, electric that needs recharging like you have would work for
most people around here. We have too many people traveling too far
for it to work. Tomorrow I'm going about 7.5 hours for a trip.
That's a long ways to go on a battery, esp. if you are using it to
heat the car (10F and 70mph wind chill). It might work in some areas,
but you're still burning something for electricity.
(side note, we are 100% hydro, but not for environmental reasons. our
muni electric buys it from Canada because it's cheap).
Rather than getting rid of cars, that aren't used all that much. Why
not just get rid of air conditioners. they are on all of the time and
use a huge amount of electricity.
Try living in central California where 100's are common or Arkansas
where 98 degrees and 98% humidity makes sweating in the shade a sport.
Some places need A/C.
For the record I owned a huge 5,000 square foot house in Minnesota north
of the twin cities and it had 4 kinds of heat.
1. Propane forced air.
2. Electric baseboards.
3. Oil fired hot water radiators.
4. 2 wood burning stoves and a fireplace.
5. Even a fire place in the detached 1,000 square foot garage.
When it got to 25 below zero I used wood as much as possible but needed
to use the others when the wood ran out at about 3 in the morning.
Except for the wood which just required me to chop it, the rest cost
real money.
There are no free rides.
Bill Baka
That's exactly my point. AC allowed the development of California
and Arkansas and then people pitch about the energy usage an
pollution. If you want to do something real about pollution, move
somewhere that requires less energy to live. Even as it is,
electricity is notoriously inefficient. I heat my house from maybe
November to April (or so, depending on the year) and then use no power
for heating and cooling (other than cooking and hot water) for the
rest of the year. No energy usage is the only free ride. I use 1 fan
upstairs if it really hot out. It isn't cars that create the energy
crisis and pollution, it is AC. Its impact on society has been huge.
So wouldn't you agree that farmland protection in warm areas (which often
are well-suited to growing crops) would also serve the purpose of preventing
the building of McMansions in those areas, which will have a legacy of
increased power consumption for at least 50 years?
No, it won't prevent anything. It just means the they will build them
farther out from the city in another field or cut down another
hillside to build them. If someone is hell-bent on building a house,
they will build it somewhere.
donquijote1954
2007-03-08 17:21:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Pat
Electric cars? Guess what. Our electric grid is near capacity and
you want to plug your cars in? Great, you feel good about having an
expensive, stupid electric car while somebody is out building a coal
or oil plant to generate electricity and ship it to you. Okay, they
might be able to put out less pollution but it is still coal or oil.
Electricity doesn't just come out of you plug. It does, however, grow
on trees. Okay, no really, but fuel grows in fields. If you want to
cut your dependence on fossil fuels, switch to vegetable oil. You
busses and trucks and cars can run on that. It's simple, less
pollution, and easily stops the dependence on fossils. Okay, don't
want that, go with bio-diesel.
REPUGLICAN ALERT!!!
I almost suspected that, but then she went on to accept bicycles as a
good idea, which is clearly the first line of defense against Global
Warming. Our warmongering president spoke about alternative energy,
but "forgot" about the one that runs on banana and water: the bicycle.
If he only emphasized the bike, we would be far better off.
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Pat
Sorry for the rant, but if you are going to save the world, be
practical and do thing that really make a difference, not just get
what you don't want to see out of your sight.
Sorry for the rant, but this
Dude,
Slow down.
The idea for electric cars should be that if one just has to own an SUV
(soccer mom or guy who needs the hauling space) then they should have
one. They should also be required to buy a little tiny, barely can get
into it, econo-box for running around town to do those non-hauling
trips. The little one can be a total electric that you plug in at night
and never go over 30 miles in one day.
The insurance companies could help by making large vehicles pay a much
bigger fee for comprehensive collision liability for the SUV and almost
nothing for the little econo box.
The bottom line is that if you are an ecology abuser you get to pay.
Bill Baka- Hide quoted text -
That's a great idea above. Pity the SUVs are actually promoted in
every way.

To sum it up: THE REVOLUTION 1) WILL EMPHASIZE MULTIMODAL
TRANSPORTATION, 2) PROMOTE NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND 3) WILL PENALIZE THE
BIG AND STUPID.
nash
2007-03-08 18:03:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Pat
Electric cars? Guess what. Our electric grid is near capacity and
you want to plug your cars in? Great, you feel good about having an
expensive, stupid electric car while somebody is out building a coal
or oil plant to generate electricity and ship it to you. Okay, they
might be able to put out less pollution but it is still coal or oil.
Electricity doesn't just come out of you plug. It does, however, grow
on trees. Okay, no really, but fuel grows in fields. If you want to
cut your dependence on fossil fuels, switch to vegetable oil. You
busses and trucks and cars can run on that. It's simple, less
pollution, and easily stops the dependence on fossils. Okay, don't
want that, go with bio-diesel.
REPUGLICAN ALERT!!!
I almost suspected that, but then she went on to accept bicycles as a
good idea, which is clearly the first line of defense against Global
Warming. Our warmongering president spoke about alternative energy,
but "forgot" about the one that runs on banana and water: the bicycle.
If he only emphasized the bike, we would be far better off.
Post by Bill Baka
Post by Pat
Sorry for the rant, but if you are going to save the world, be
practical and do thing that really make a difference, not just get
what you don't want to see out of your sight.
Sorry for the rant, but this
Dude,
Slow down.
The idea for electric cars should be that if one just has to own an SUV
(soccer mom or guy who needs the hauling space) then they should have
one. They should also be required to buy a little tiny, barely can get
into it, econo-box for running around town to do those non-hauling
trips. The little one can be a total electric that you plug in at night
and never go over 30 miles in one day.
The insurance companies could help by making large vehicles pay a much
bigger fee for comprehensive collision liability for the SUV and almost
nothing for the little econo box.
The bottom line is that if you are an ecology abuser you get to pay.
Bill Baka- Hide quoted text -
That's a great idea above. Pity the SUVs are actually promoted in
every way.
To sum it up: THE REVOLUTION 1) WILL EMPHASIZE MULTIMODAL
TRANSPORTATION, 2) PROMOTE NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND 3) WILL PENALIZE THE
BIG AND STUPID.
And penalize the stupid shouters first
Daryl Hunt
2007-03-05 20:11:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the
problem.
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we
cruise
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
Post by Daryl Hunt
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Not all, I think I read somewhere where a city went to Electrics.
Ok, that exports pollution to rural areas.
Nope, we run out tricity from Hydroelectric around here and export it to
other regions. If you are in California you can almost bet that there are a
couple or three megawatts passing through.


And of course a plug-in hybrid
Post by donquijote1954
electric car would meet about 90% of the commuting needs of America.
And still pollute like any other gasoline powered car. Newsflash, the
electric power is made from Gasoline.
Doc O'Leary
2007-03-05 14:08:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
That is simply not true. A transit bus is a large mass that experiences
more than average stop-and-go travel. For that kind of use case,
regenerative braking will show bigger gains than it would for your
average highway commuter car.
--
My personal UDP list: 127.0.0.1, 4ax.com, buzzardnews.com, googlegroups.com,
heapnode.com, localhost, x-privat.org
donquijote1954
2007-03-05 17:05:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.- Hide quoted text -
Only true if less than 7 passengers ride it. And still it means fewer
vehicles out there to feed traffic jams...

Using Mass Transit
The key to mass transit is the word "mass". The more of us who use it,
the more global warming pollution it saves. That's because a bus or
train releases more CO2 into the air than a car, but a bus or train
holds many, many more people and thus keeps all those cars off the
road.

A bus with just 7 passengers is more fuel efficient than the average
car. A full bus? Six times more efficient. And a full train? A
whopping 15 times more efficient.

http://www.globalwarmingsolutions.org/publictransportation.phphttp://www.globalwarmingsolutions.org/publictransportation.php
donquijote1954
2007-03-05 17:28:19 UTC
Permalink
The apple gives you a good picture of where we stand...

A brief history of consumption
http://www.ecotality.com/

And then I read about the ecobus (right here in the USof A)...

Arizona Showcases Hydrogen Fuel Cell Bus

Arizona's first hydrogen powered bus is on the move in Arizona. The
ECObus is powered by a fuel cell that runs on pure hydrogen. ECOtality
has teamed up with Arizona Public Service (APS) company to bring the
ECObus to the state of Arizona with the objective of educating the
public on the use of renewable energies.

Beginning its excursion in Phoenix, Arizona, this zero-emissions bus
showcases the capabilities of hydrogen fuel cell technology.

Fuel Cell Technology is Good for the Environment

When hydrogen is used in a fuel cell, it produces electricity without
any harmful emissions. In fact, all that comes out of the tailpipe is
a small amount of water vapor. This is in sharp contrast to the
conventional vehicles we drive and ride-in today. Current conventional
vehicles are fueled by petroleum and powered by internal combustion
engines, contributing significantly to greenhouse gases and other
noxious substances that are emitted into our atmosphere daily.

As such, hydrogen is an ideal renewable energy source, answering
today's complex energy problems with its ability to power cars,
trucks, homes and businesses with no pollution or greenhouse gases.

Transportation of the Future

The bus uses three HyPM® 65 Fuel Cell Power Modules capable of
providing a total of 180 kilowatts (kW) of power. A 720-volt bank of
ultra-capacitors provides the remaining power needed to reach the peak
power requirements of 350 kW.

While the dominant power source comes from fuel cells, the bus'
efficient, hybrid-power construction represents an attractive solution
for future fuel cell powered buses. This is mainly because a hybrid
configuration enables the system to readily provide instantaneous full
power, with reduced capital cost and increased fuel efficiency. The
anticipated cost reduction is seen as a pathway that could speed up
the commercialization of fuel cell technology.

http://www.ecotality.com/ecobus/
Bill Baka
2007-03-05 19:34:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.- Hide quoted text -
Only true if less than 7 passengers ride it. And still it means fewer
vehicles out there to feed traffic jams...
Using Mass Transit
The key to mass transit is the word "mass". The more of us who use it,
the more global warming pollution it saves. That's because a bus or
train releases more CO2 into the air than a car, but a bus or train
holds many, many more people and thus keeps all those cars off the
road.
A bus with just 7 passengers is more fuel efficient than the average
car.
How many carpoolers do you see crammed with 7 people?
Reality check?
Bill Baka

A full bus? Six times more efficient. And a full train? A
Post by donquijote1954
whopping 15 times more efficient.
http://www.globalwarmingsolutions.org/publictransportation.phphttp://www.globalwarmingsolutions.org/publictransportation.php
George Conklin
2007-03-05 21:44:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.- Hide quoted text -
Only true if less than 7 passengers ride it. And still it means fewer
vehicles out there to feed traffic jams...
Using Mass Transit
The key to mass transit is the word "mass". The more of us who use it,
the more global warming pollution it saves. That's because a bus or
train releases more CO2 into the air than a car, but a bus or train
holds many, many more people and thus keeps all those cars off the
road.
A bus with just 7 passengers is more fuel efficient than the average
car.
How many carpoolers do you see crammed with 7 people?
Reality check?
Bill Baka
These fake comparison compare a full bus with car with only the driver. If
both were full, in transit service they would again be equal. Long-distance
buses, NEVER trains, yield the biggest savings. But no one wants to hear
what works. I know there are many train foamers, no bus foamers.
Amy Blankenship
2007-03-05 23:46:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
These fake comparison compare a full bus with car with only the driver.
If
both were full, in transit service they would again be equal.
Long-distance
buses, NEVER trains, yield the biggest savings. But no one wants to hear
what works. I know there are many train foamers, no bus foamers.
I have never noticed busses being dirtier than trains.
George Conklin
2007-03-06 11:16:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Amy Blankenship
Post by George Conklin
These fake comparison compare a full bus with car with only the driver.
If
both were full, in transit service they would again be equal.
Long-distance
buses, NEVER trains, yield the biggest savings. But no one wants to hear
what works. I know there are many train foamers, no bus foamers.
I have never noticed busses being dirtier than trains.
According to the EPA, current trains are vastly polluting, much more so than
buses.
Amy Blankenship
2007-03-06 15:48:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Amy Blankenship
Post by George Conklin
These fake comparison compare a full bus with car with only the driver.
If
both were full, in transit service they would again be equal.
Long-distance
buses, NEVER trains, yield the biggest savings. But no one wants to
hear
Post by Amy Blankenship
Post by George Conklin
what works. I know there are many train foamers, no bus foamers.
I have never noticed busses being dirtier than trains.
According to the EPA, current trains are vastly polluting, much more so than
buses.
What does that have to do with how often they get washed?
nash
2007-03-07 18:29:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Amy Blankenship
Post by George Conklin
These fake comparison compare a full bus with car with only the driver.
If
both were full, in transit service they would again be equal.
Long-distance
buses, NEVER trains, yield the biggest savings. But no one wants to
hear
Post by Amy Blankenship
Post by George Conklin
what works. I know there are many train foamers, no bus foamers.
I have never noticed busses being dirtier than trains.
According to the EPA, current trains are vastly polluting, much more so than
buses.
What are they running on coal? I thought they were electric.
George Conklin
2007-03-07 21:54:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by nash
Post by George Conklin
Post by Amy Blankenship
Post by George Conklin
These fake comparison compare a full bus with car with only the driver.
If
both were full, in transit service they would again be equal.
Long-distance
buses, NEVER trains, yield the biggest savings. But no one wants to
hear
Post by Amy Blankenship
Post by George Conklin
what works. I know there are many train foamers, no bus foamers.
I have never noticed busses being dirtier than trains.
According to the EPA, current trains are vastly polluting, much more so than
buses.
What are they running on coal? I thought they were electric.
\
Diesel engines currently in use by trains are horribly polluting.
Clark F Morris
2007-03-06 03:15:14 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:44:40 GMT, "George Conklin"
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.-
Hide quoted text -
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Only true if less than 7 passengers ride it. And still it means fewer
vehicles out there to feed traffic jams...
Using Mass Transit
The key to mass transit is the word "mass". The more of us who use it,
the more global warming pollution it saves. That's because a bus or
train releases more CO2 into the air than a car, but a bus or train
holds many, many more people and thus keeps all those cars off the
road.
A bus with just 7 passengers is more fuel efficient than the average
car.
How many carpoolers do you see crammed with 7 people?
Reality check?
Bill Baka
These fake comparison compare a full bus with car with only the driver. If
both were full, in transit service they would again be equal. Long-distance
buses, NEVER trains, yield the biggest savings. But no one wants to hear
what works. I know there are many train foamers, no bus foamers.
Ironically, given other statistics, in the rush hour, the bus is
likely to be full over a good portion of the route while the car is
more likely to be single occupant only. In the off peak, the bus
normally is significantly less loaded while the car is more likely to
have more than one person in it.

Long distance buses may have greater fuel savings but that is at the
cost of narrow and cramped seating. As someone who took the Acadian
Lines bus on its journey that was almost twice as long as a car trip,
I can state that the comfort for someone over 6 feet tall is nowhere
near that of a standard Amfleet Corridor car. If Amfleet were to have
3 - 2 seating at a 32 inch seat spacing and no food service, a 5 car
train would probably have the same or slightly more seat miles per
gallon.
George Conklin
2007-03-06 11:17:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Clark F Morris
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:44:40 GMT, "George Conklin"
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.-
Hide quoted text -
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Only true if less than 7 passengers ride it. And still it means fewer
vehicles out there to feed traffic jams...
Using Mass Transit
The key to mass transit is the word "mass". The more of us who use it,
the more global warming pollution it saves. That's because a bus or
train releases more CO2 into the air than a car, but a bus or train
holds many, many more people and thus keeps all those cars off the
road.
A bus with just 7 passengers is more fuel efficient than the average
car.
How many carpoolers do you see crammed with 7 people?
Reality check?
Bill Baka
These fake comparison compare a full bus with car with only the driver.
If
Post by Clark F Morris
Post by George Conklin
both were full, in transit service they would again be equal.
Long-distance
Post by Clark F Morris
Post by George Conklin
buses, NEVER trains, yield the biggest savings. But no one wants to hear
what works. I know there are many train foamers, no bus foamers.
Ironically, given other statistics, in the rush hour, the bus is
likely to be full over a good portion of the route while the car is
more likely to be single occupant only. In the off peak, the bus
normally is significantly less loaded while the car is more likely to
have more than one person in it.
But the bus then has to go back empty for the next load. The car stays
put. This is the source of much fuel savings. And of course off-hour
service, needed for transit, is the source of a lot of wasted fuel too.
Post by Clark F Morris
Long distance buses may have greater fuel savings but that is at the
cost of narrow and cramped seating. As someone who took the Acadian
Lines bus on its journey that was almost twice as long as a car trip,
I can state that the comfort for someone over 6 feet tall is nowhere
near that of a standard Amfleet Corridor car. If Amfleet were to have
3 - 2 seating at a 32 inch seat spacing and no food service, a 5 car
train would probably have the same or slightly more seat miles per
gallon.
George Conklin
2007-03-05 21:42:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.- Hide quoted text -
Only true if less than 7 passengers ride it. And still it means fewer
vehicles out there to feed traffic jams...
Using Mass Transit
The key to mass transit is the word "mass". The more of us who use it,
the more global warming pollution it saves.
Full cars would also do the same thing, but the laws are set up to
discourage that and to encourage money-losing transit systems.
Brian Huntley
2007-03-06 04:32:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by donquijote1954
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.-
Hide quoted text -
Post by donquijote1954
Only true if less than 7 passengers ride it. And still it means fewer
vehicles out there to feed traffic jams...
Using Mass Transit
The key to mass transit is the word "mass". The more of us who use it,
the more global warming pollution it saves.
Full cars would also do the same thing, but the laws are set up to
discourage that and to encourage money-losing transit systems.
Care to point out any of those laws against having more than one
person in a car during rush hour? Or do you mean the widely ignored
"Don't pull into the bike lane and perform a Chinese Fire Drill
during rush hour" law?
George Conklin
2007-03-06 11:19:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brian Huntley
Post by George Conklin
Post by donquijote1954
Post by George Conklin
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro,
or, dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.-
Hide quoted text -
Post by donquijote1954
Only true if less than 7 passengers ride it. And still it means fewer
vehicles out there to feed traffic jams...
Using Mass Transit
The key to mass transit is the word "mass". The more of us who use it,
the more global warming pollution it saves.
Full cars would also do the same thing, but the laws are set up to
discourage that and to encourage money-losing transit systems.
Care to point out any of those laws against having more than one
person in a car during rush hour?
Even the DC SLUG system is only semi-legal. If you take someone in your
car for a fee, you become an illegal taxi. The poor ignore this rule in
rural areas, but the middle class does not want the loss of insurance, for
example.
Amy Blankenship
2007-03-06 15:56:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Conklin
Post by Brian Huntley
Post by George Conklin
Full cars would also do the same thing, but the laws are set up to
discourage that and to encourage money-losing transit systems.
Care to point out any of those laws against having more than one
person in a car during rush hour?
Even the DC SLUG system is only semi-legal. If you take someone in your
car for a fee, you become an illegal taxi. The poor ignore this rule in
rural areas, but the middle class does not want the loss of insurance, for
example.
Laws are set up to discourage some things and encourage others. When the
laws discourage things that other people think are wise and good, such as a
level playing field for small business or a pedestrian-friendly environment,
you deny that the law does any such thing and claim that the existing
situation is the inevitable result of a free market and what people want.
The truth is, I have never really heard anyone upset that they can't hire
out their car for a fee, or anyone upset that they can't hire their
neighbor's car, whereas many people are upset by the things that you see as
right and inevitable.

So just suck it up, George. Your little pipe dream of being able to found
"George's unlicensed taxi service" is never going to happen. And the vast
majority of people in this country resoundingly don't care.

-Amy
Baxter
2007-03-07 00:51:35 UTC
Permalink
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Free software - Baxter Codeworks www.baxcode.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by George Conklin
Anything which makes a bus more efficient would make a car even more
efficient than the bus. Right now transit buses waste fuel big time.
Nope. Different uses. Buses do a LOT more stop-and-go than cars -- which
is what wastes fuel.
Daryl Hunt
2007-03-05 01:36:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Bill Baka
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
Too optimistic. Somebody, somewhere is probably burning coal or oil to
make the electricity to electrolyze the water to make the Hydrogen.
It only really works if the electricity comes from wind, solar, hydro, or,
dare I say it, NUculear (Bush pronunciation).
Bill Baka
You will notice that there was no mention of the obvious. If you use the
electricity without converting it to anything it's clean (Hydrogen is not as
clean) then you do get what you want. Shoot, even the Feds recognise that
at tax time. Like the Hybrids (which are actually dismall failures for a
replacement, just a stop gap) you get tax credits if you buy an electric
car. Check out Portland, Ore for being Electric Friendly. But until
everyone gets their noses out of the Petro or Carbon fuel BS don't look for
it to go much further. Electrics now have the same range as the "Hydrogens"
and "Fuel Cells" and are a danged sight easier to maintain without going
boom in the night. Yes, Gertrude, Hydrogen is very, very dangerous.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 3877 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
Brian Huntley
2007-03-06 04:46:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daryl Hunt
You will notice that there was no mention of the obvious. If you use the
electricity without converting it to anything it's clean (Hydrogen is not as
clean) then you do get what you want.
It's bloody hard to bring a gallon of electricity home, though. You
generally have to convert it to something, even if it's some oddball
chemical soup of lead and sulpheric acid. That, or bring a LONG cord
with you.
Daryl Hunt
2007-03-07 03:23:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Brian Huntley
Post by Daryl Hunt
You will notice that there was no mention of the obvious. If you use the
electricity without converting it to anything it's clean (Hydrogen is not as
clean) then you do get what you want.
It's bloody hard to bring a gallon of electricity home, though. You
generally have to convert it to something, even if it's some oddball
chemical soup of lead and sulpheric acid. That, or bring a LONG cord
with you.
I don't need to bring a bucket of electricity home. I have it stockpiled in
any electrical outlet on my house, garage, office building (the owner of the
building is installing an outlet for my electric vehicle outside). In fact,
they are all over the place. Now, if you are in the outback then recharging
your bush buggy is the least of your worries, Mate.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 4131 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
Qui si parla Campagnolo
2007-03-05 13:22:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
How do they make the hydrogen? Do ya suppose their is some energy use
to make that happen? And is the energy gained higher or lower than the
energy expense to get the hydrogen?
Clark F Morris
2007-03-05 14:08:02 UTC
Permalink
On 5 Mar 2007 05:22:38 -0800, "Qui si parla Campagnolo"
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
How do they make the hydrogen? Do ya suppose their is some energy use
to make that happen? And is the energy gained higher or lower than the
energy expense to get the hydrogen?
In Iceland, I believe that they have geothermal power plants taking
advantage of hot lava areas underground.
Bill Baka
2007-03-05 19:28:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Clark F Morris
On 5 Mar 2007 05:22:38 -0800, "Qui si parla Campagnolo"
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Post by Qui si parla Campagnolo
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
OK, how is the bus not polluting?
You don't see it everyday, but it's possible. Just some new
technologies and some political will to make it happen...
Heaven Help Bus
A visit to Iceland spurs dreams of a hydrogen future
The loneliness of the long-distance rider.I have seen the future, and
it works.
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
http://www.grist.org/comments/soapbox/2005/07/19/mckibben-hydrogenbus/
I have a dream...that someday buses will not pollute. Actually we
could make it happen now much easier than having all the cars be
replaced with hybrid. Just change the fleet of buses to hydrogen or
some other technologies out there.
We can make it happen with THE REVOLUTION. Coming soon...
How do they make the hydrogen? Do ya suppose their is some energy use
to make that happen? And is the energy gained higher or lower than the
energy expense to get the hydrogen?
In Iceland, I believe that they have geothermal power plants taking
advantage of hot lava areas underground.
The whole world is not Iceland!!!!!
Bill Baka
Larry Bud
2007-03-05 17:22:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
The 111 bus rolls quietly up to the Mjodd terminal in eastern
Reykjavik at 11:19 a.m., and I climb aboard. For 45 minutes, we cruise
through the suburbs and then to the central square downtown, picking
up and discharging eight passengers along the way. Fuel cells that
would have filled the space of several passenger seats five years ago
are now small enough to fit in the roof panels. And out the exhaust
pipe: a trickle of water.
Did you realize that water vapor is MORE of a greenhouse gas than CO2?
Pat
2007-03-06 14:51:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
or the whole REVOLUTION...
http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution
It is -4F outside with a 20 mph wind and 3 feet of snow on the
ground. I need to run out, pick up my son from school and take him 20
miles to the orthodontist -- then get him back to school for the rest
of the day.

... and you want me to ride a bike?????????????? You're out of your
minds.

As for the bus, I'd consider it but the school busses don't go that
far.

... oh, you mean public transit. Yeah right. We don't even have
taxis in this area.

You know, those things aren't big on the Rez.
RicodJour
2007-03-06 17:23:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pat
It is -4F outside with a 20 mph wind and 3 feet of snow on the
ground. I need to run out, pick up my son from school and take him 20
miles to the orthodontist -- then get him back to school for the rest
of the day.
... and you want me to ride a bike?????????????? You're out of your
minds.
There's always an excuse with you, Pat. ;)
Post by Pat
As for the bus, I'd consider it but the school busses don't go that
far.
... oh, you mean public transit. Yeah right. We don't even have
taxis in this area.
You know, those things aren't big on the Rez.
You're holding up progress by not living in an overcrowded area.
Please move immediately. And bring some tax-free cigarettes.

R
Pat
2007-03-06 18:25:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by RicodJour
Post by Pat
It is -4F outside with a 20 mph wind and 3 feet of snow on the
ground. I need to run out, pick up my son from school and take him 20
miles to the orthodontist -- then get him back to school for the rest
of the day.
... and you want me to ride a bike?????????????? You're out of your
minds.
There's always an excuse with you, Pat. ;)
Post by Pat
As for the bus, I'd consider it but the school busses don't go that
far.
... oh, you mean public transit. Yeah right. We don't even have
taxis in this area.
You know, those things aren't big on the Rez.
You're holding up progress by not living in an overcrowded area.
Please move immediately. And bring some tax-free cigarettes.
R
I might be driving to Long Island on Friday (seriously). I could
bring you some if you want. They've went up a bit. Now they are
about $11 or $12 per carton. One local show has a "sampler" of 2
packs of each generic brand so you can see which type you want to have
kill you. Or I could hook you up with a local company. You can't
swing a cat around here and not hit someone who is selling cigs. Our
post office has so many cigs moving through it I can't believe the
workers don't get a nicotine high just from breathing the air.
nash
2007-03-06 17:26:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Pat
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
or the whole REVOLUTION...
http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution
It is -4F outside with a 20 mph wind and 3 feet of snow on the
ground. I need to run out, pick up my son from school and take him 20
miles to the orthodontist -- then get him back to school for the rest
of the day.
... and you want me to ride a bike?????????????? You're out of your
minds.
As for the bus, I'd consider it but the school busses don't go that
far.
... oh, you mean public transit. Yeah right. We don't even have
taxis in this area.
You know, those things aren't big on the Rez.
Well, actually, people choose to live close to their needs like school,
work, shopping, dentist. You chose not to.
Pat
2007-03-06 18:43:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by nash
Post by Pat
Post by donquijote1954
Hey, be smart. You are part of the solution, not part of the problem.
And you save the buck. Dinosaurs are a thing of the past and the
little furry animals are here to stay.
There are two versions of it...
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235847689274986069
http://www.zazzle.com/product/235396990102826110
or the whole REVOLUTION...
http://webspawner.com/users/bananarevolution
It is -4F outside with a 20 mph wind and 3 feet of snow on the
ground. I need to run out, pick up my son from school and take him 20
miles to the orthodontist -- then get him back to school for the rest
of the day.
... and you want me to ride a bike?????????????? You're out of your
minds.
As for the bus, I'd consider it but the school busses don't go that
far.
... oh, you mean public transit. Yeah right. We don't even have
taxis in this area.
You know, those things aren't big on the Rez.
Well, actually, people choose to live close to their needs like school,
work, shopping, dentist. You chose not to.
But I am close to everything

The school is only 3 or 4 miles away (but the bus stop is just down
the street). And the grocery store is near it. Walmart, "the mall",
the kid's dojo and the orthodontist are only about 20 miles away.
There are hospitals 20 miles to the east, 17 miles to the south, 45
miles to the west and about 30 miles to the north. The ski slope is
just 8 miles away so the kids can go skiing a couple of nights a
week. How much closer to "things" could anyone want to be?
Doc O'Leary
2007-03-07 17:16:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by nash
Well, actually, people choose to live close to their needs like school,
work, shopping, dentist. You chose not to.
It's also that urban planning in most cases makes automobiles the
preferred way to go long distances. There is pavement all over the
place but, as a result, no real transit corridors. It's a tragic case
of "water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink".
--
My personal UDP list: 127.0.0.1, 4ax.com, buzzardnews.com, googlegroups.com,
heapnode.com, localhost, x-privat.org
Loading...